[OSDC Israel] feedbacks from the conference
Roman Yakovenko
roman.yakovenko at gmail.com
Thu Mar 2 05:27:40 PST 2006
On 3/2/06, Levenglick Dov-RM07994 <Dov at freescale.com> wrote:
> Since you asked:
> 1. All Perl 6 related talks (Larry, Audrey, Yuval etc.) gave my some insight in to the (new ?) language, but actually stressed how much I have to learn Perl (again!).
>
> 2. I finally became convinced that Python is a poor excuse for a language and that I should >forget all plans that I ever had about learning it.
Sorry can keep this inside:
But it seems that you have a lot of free time - to learn same language
one more time.
Personally I prefer to stay with Python and to do some real job.
Please get me right I do not want to hurt you, there is nothing
personal in this post.
but why? Why do you want to spend time to debug some programs that has
been ported
from perl5 to Perl 6, why do you want to read files that mix Perl 5
and Perl 6 syntax?
Also I don't understand why to implement Perl6 using Perl5? Is Perl5
is not good language
for such task? If so why do you think Perl6 will be?
I don't understand this. Sorry.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
More information about the OSDC-discuss
mailing list